Vertalingen Engels

Evidence: A report about the accountability of the choices made within the process of the provision of healthcare The examinee:  has submitted a professional product that complies with the quality requirements of the institution  describes the information collected to adapt the care  describes conclusions based on this information  uses these conclusions to describe the choices to adapt the care  describes how she has taken into account the wishes and requirements of the patient and others involved

 describes how she has taken into account the guidelines of the institution Substantiation of the evaluation of the work process with examples that are

related to the evaluation criteria

Examiner’s name : (written in full in block letters ) …………………………………………

Function :

Institution :

□ Practical Vocational Training □ Training

Signature:

Examiner’s name : (written in full in block letters ) …………………………………………

Function :

Institution :

□ Practical Vocational Training □ Training

Signature:

Total amount of points WP 1.11

..

add up only if there are no unsatisfactory marks

Cutting score

All of the evaluation criteria have been evaluated as satisfactory or better

Standardisation

Good:

≥ 19 points

Satisfactory:

All criteria have been evaluated as satisfactory or better

Unsatisfactory:

One or more criteria have been evaluated as unsatisfactory

Evaluation of work process 1.11 Evaluates healthcare delivery (tick where appropriate)

 This work process has been evaluated as good

 This work process has been evaluated as satisfactory

 This work process has been evaluated as unsatisfactory

Examinee’s name:

(written in full in block letters ) …………………………………………

Signature (seen):

…………………………………………

Stichting Consortium Beroepsonderwijs

10

Z&W series 2014

Nurse in individual healthcare training

2014-vz-ig3-e1