Vertalingen Engels

and/or next of kin

Foundations of the assessment of the work process with examples relating to the

performance criteria.

Examiner’s name : (written in full in block letters ) …………………………………………

Function :

Institution :

□ Practical Vocational Training □ Training

Signature:

Examiner’s name : (written in full in block letters ) …………………………………………

Function :

Institution :

□ Practical Vocational Training □ Training

Signature:

Total amount of points WP 1.8

add up only if there are no unsatisfactory

..

marks

Cutting score

All of the evaluation criteria have been evaluated as satisfactory or better.

Standardisation

Good:

≥ 22 points

Satisfactory:

All criteria have been evaluated as satisfactory or better

Unsatisfactory:

One or more criteria have been evaluated as unsatisfactory

Evaluation of work process 1.8 Provides information, advice and instruction

(tick where appropriate)

 This work process has been evaluated as good

 This work process has been evaluated as satisfactory

 This work process has been evaluated as unsatisfactory

Examinee’s name:

………………………………………..

(written in full in block letters)

Signature (seen):

…………………………………………

13

Consortium vocational training

Z&W series 2014

Training: Carer level 3

coding: (2014-vz-ig3-e2)